0.06/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.11/0.31	% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
0.11/0.31	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.31	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.31	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.31	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.31	% CPULimit   : 960
0.11/0.32	% WCLimit    : 120
0.11/0.32	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 05:56:05 EDT 2022
0.11/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.43	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.15/0.43	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.15/0.43	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.15/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
0.15/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.44	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.15/0.44	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.44	# Starting almost_fo_3_lam with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.44	# ho_unfolding_3 with pid 10584 completed with status 0
0.15/0.44	# Result found by ho_unfolding_3
0.15/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
0.15/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.44	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.15/0.44	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.44	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SHSSMSBN
0.15/0.44	# partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF22-SHSSMMBN
0.15/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.15/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10 with 325s (1) cores
0.15/0.44	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 61s (1) cores
0.15/0.44	# Starting new_bool_1 with 55s (1) cores
0.15/0.44	# Starting new_bool_2 with 55s (1) cores
0.15/0.44	# Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 55s (1) cores
0.15/0.44	# new_ho_10 with pid 10591 completed with status 0
0.15/0.44	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.15/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN.
0.15/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.44	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 600s (5) cores
0.15/0.44	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.44	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SHSSMSBN
0.15/0.44	# partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF22-SHSSMMBN
0.15/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.15/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10 with 325s (1) cores
0.15/0.44	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.15/0.44	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.15/0.44	
0.15/0.44	# Proof found!
0.15/0.44	# SZS status Theorem
0.15/0.44	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_22, type, meq_ind: mu > mu > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_23, type, mtrue: $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_24, type, mfalse: $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_25, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_26, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_27, type, mand: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_28, type, mimplies: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_29, type, mimplied: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_30, type, mequiv: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_31, type, mxor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_32, type, mforall_ind: (mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_33, type, mforall_indset: ((mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_34, type, mforall_prop: (($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_35, type, mexists_ind: (mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_36, type, mexists_indset: ((mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_37, type, mexists_prop: (($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_38, type, mbox_generic: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_39, type, mdia_generic: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_40, type, rel: $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_41, type, mbox: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_42, type, mdia: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_43, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_44, type, minvalid: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_45, type, positive: (mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_46, type, god: mu > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_47, type, esk1_2: $i > (mu > $i > $o) > $i).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_48, type, esk2_2: $i > (mu > $i > $o) > mu).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_49, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_50, type, epred1_2: $i > mu > mu > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_51, type, epred2_0: mu > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(decl_52, type, epred3_2: $i > mu > mu > $i > $o).
0.15/0.44	thf(mdia_generic, axiom, ((mdia_generic)=(^[X15:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(?[X16:$i]:(((X15 @ X3 @ X16)&(X4 @ X16)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL016^0.ax', mdia_generic)).
0.15/0.44	thf(defD1, axiom, ((god)=(^[X1:mu]:(mforall_indset @ (^[X17:mu > $i > $o]:(mimplies @ (positive @ X17) @ (X17 @ X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', defD1)).
0.15/0.44	thf(mimplies, axiom, ((mimplies)=(^[X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X4 @ X3)=>(X5 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL016^0.ax', mimplies)).
0.15/0.44	thf(mforall_indset, axiom, ((mforall_indset)=(^[X7:(mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X8:mu > $i > $o]:((X7 @ X8 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL016^0.ax', mforall_indset)).
0.15/0.44	thf(mexists_ind, axiom, ((mexists_ind)=(^[X11:mu > $i > $o, X3:$i]:(?[X1:mu]:((X11 @ X1 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL016^0.ax', mexists_ind)).
0.15/0.44	thf(mdia, axiom, ((mdia)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(?[X20:$i]:(((rel @ Z1 @ X20)&(Z0 @ X20)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL016^0.ax', mdia)).
0.15/0.44	thf(mvalid, axiom, ((mvalid)=(^[X4:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((X4 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL016^0.ax', mvalid)).
0.15/0.44	thf(corC, conjecture, (mvalid @ (mdia @ (mexists_ind @ (^[X1:mu]:(god @ X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', corC)).
0.15/0.44	thf(thmT1, lemma, (mvalid @ (mforall_indset @ (^[X18:mu > $i > $o]:(mimplies @ (positive @ X18) @ (mdia @ (mexists_ind @ (^[X1:mu]:(X18 @ X1)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', thmT1)).
0.15/0.44	thf(axA3, axiom, (mvalid @ (positive @ god)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axA3)).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_10, plain, ((mdia_generic)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(?[X16:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2 @ X16)&(Z1 @ X16)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mdia_generic])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_11, plain, ((god)=(^[Z0:mu, Z1:$i]:(![X21:mu > $i > $o]:((((positive @ X21 @ Z1)=>(X21 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[defD1])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_12, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2)=>(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_13, plain, ((mforall_indset)=(^[Z0:(mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o, Z1:$i]:(![X8:mu > $i > $o]:((Z0 @ X8 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mforall_indset])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_14, plain, ((mexists_ind)=(^[Z0:mu > $i > $o, Z1:$i]:(?[X1:mu]:((Z0 @ X1 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mexists_ind])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_15, axiom, ((mdia)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(?[X20:$i]:(((rel @ Z1 @ X20)&(Z0 @ X20)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[mdia, c_0_10])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_16, plain, ((mvalid)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((Z0 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_17, plain, ((god)=(^[Z0:mu, Z1:$i]:(![X21:mu > $i > $o]:((((positive @ X21 @ Z1)=>(X21 @ Z0 @ Z1))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_13])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ~(![X31:$i]:(?[X30:$i]:(((rel @ X31 @ X30)&?[X29:mu]:(![X28:mu > $i > $o]:(((positive @ X28 @ X30)=>(X28 @ X29 @ X30)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[corC])]), c_0_14]), c_0_15]), c_0_16]), c_0_17])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X44:$i, X45:mu, X46:mu > $i > $o, X47:$i, X48:mu]:(((~(epred2_0 @ X45 @ X44)|(~(positive @ X46 @ X44)|(X46 @ X45 @ X44)))&(((positive @ (epred3_2 @ X47 @ X48) @ X47)|(epred2_0 @ X48 @ X47))&(~(epred3_2 @ X47 @ X48 @ X48 @ X47)|(epred2_0 @ X48 @ X47))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[])])])])])])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X38:$i, X39:mu]:((((positive @ (epred1_2 @ X38 @ X39) @ X38)|~(rel @ esk3_0 @ X38))&(~(epred1_2 @ X38 @ X39 @ X39 @ X38)|~(rel @ esk3_0 @ X38)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])])])])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_21, plain, ![X1:mu, X6:mu > $i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X6 @ X1 @ X3)|~((epred2_0 @ X1 @ X3))|~((positive @ X6 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X1:mu, X3:$i]:(((positive @ (epred1_2 @ X3 @ X1) @ X3)|~((rel @ esk3_0 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_23, lemma, ![X25:$i, X24:mu > $i > $o]:(((positive @ X24 @ X25)=>?[X23:$i]:(((rel @ X25 @ X23)&?[X22:mu]:((X24 @ X22 @ X23)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thmT1]), c_0_12]), c_0_13]), c_0_14]), c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_24, plain, ![X27:$i]:((positive @ (^[Z0:mu, Z1:$i]:(![X26:mu > $i > $o]:(((positive @ X26 @ Z1)=>(X26 @ Z0 @ Z1))))) @ X27)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axA3, c_0_16]), c_0_17])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X1:mu, X3:$i]:((~((epred1_2 @ X3 @ X1 @ X1 @ X3))|~((rel @ esk3_0 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X1:mu, X2:mu, X3:$i]:(((epred1_2 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((rel @ esk3_0 @ X3))|~((epred2_0 @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_27, lemma, ![X32:$i, X33:mu > $i > $o]:((((rel @ X32 @ (esk1_2 @ X32 @ X33))|~(positive @ X33 @ X32))&((X33 @ (esk2_2 @ X32 @ X33) @ (esk1_2 @ X32 @ X33))|~(positive @ X33 @ X32)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])])])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_28, plain, ![X36:$i]:((positive @ (^[Z0:mu, Z1:$i]:(![X26:mu > $i > $o]:(((positive @ X26 @ Z1)=>(X26 @ Z0 @ Z1))))) @ X36)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_29, plain, ![X43:$i, X42:mu]:(((epred2_0 @ X42 @ X43)<=>![X41:mu > $i > $o]:(((positive @ X41 @ X43)=>(X41 @ X42 @ X43))))), introduced(definition)).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X1:mu, X3:$i]:((~((rel @ esk3_0 @ X3))|~((epred2_0 @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_31, lemma, ![X6:mu > $i > $o, X3:$i]:(((rel @ X3 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X6))|~((positive @ X6 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_32, plain, ![X3:$i]:((((positive @ epred2_0 @ X3))=(($true)))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]), c_0_29])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_33, lemma, ![X1:mu, X6:mu > $i > $o]:((~((epred2_0 @ X1 @ (esk1_2 @ esk3_0 @ X6)))|~((positive @ X6 @ esk3_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_31])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_34, lemma, ![X6:mu > $i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X6 @ (esk2_2 @ X3 @ X6) @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X6))|~((positive @ X6 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_35, plain, ![X3:$i]:((positive @ epred2_0 @ X3)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])).
0.15/0.44	thf(c_0_36, lemma, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_34]), c_0_35])]), ['proof']).
0.15/0.44	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.15/0.44	# Parsed axioms                        : 52
0.15/0.44	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.15/0.44	# Initial clauses                      : 34
0.15/0.44	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 26
0.15/0.44	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
0.15/0.44	# Processed clauses                    : 20
0.15/0.44	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.15/0.44	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.15/0.44	# ...remaining for further processing  : 20
0.15/0.44	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.15/0.44	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.15/0.44	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.15/0.44	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.15/0.44	# Generated clauses                    : 7
0.15/0.44	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
0.15/0.44	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.15/0.44	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.15/0.44	# Paramodulations                      : 7
0.15/0.44	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.15/0.44	# NegExts                              : 0
0.15/0.44	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.15/0.44	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.15/0.44	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.15/0.44	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.15/0.44	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.15/0.44	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.15/0.44	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.15/0.44	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.15/0.44	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.15/0.44	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.15/0.44	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.15/0.44	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.15/0.44	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.15/0.44	# Current number of processed clauses  : 11
0.15/0.44	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.15/0.44	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.15/0.44	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.15/0.44	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 10
0.15/0.44	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.15/0.44	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.15/0.44	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.15/0.44	# Current number of archived clauses   : 9
0.15/0.44	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
0.15/0.44	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
0.15/0.44	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.15/0.44	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.15/0.44	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.15/0.44	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.15/0.44	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.15/0.44	# Condensation attempts                : 20
0.15/0.44	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.15/0.44	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1976
0.15/0.44	
0.15/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.44	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.15/0.44	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.15/0.44	# Total time               : 0.006 s
0.15/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1992 pages
0.15/0.44	
0.15/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.44	# User time                : 0.010 s
0.15/0.44	# System time              : 0.007 s
0.15/0.44	# Total time               : 0.018 s
0.15/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
0.15/0.44	EOF